Performance: Difference between revisions

From FreeMind
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:


Some people experienced long starts of 0.8.0, for their having a lot of entries in classpath.
Some people experienced long starts of 0.8.0, for their having a lot of entries in classpath.
In 0.9.0 having many addition icons in ~/freemind/icons slows down the startup


==Links==
==Links==
Line 14: Line 16:
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Performance_tuning Performance tuning] at Wikipedia
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Performance_tuning Performance tuning] at Wikipedia
* [http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1820847&group_id=7118&atid=1006953 Task: Memory consumption report for 0.9.0]
* [http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1820847&group_id=7118&atid=1006953 Task: Memory consumption report for 0.9.0]
* [http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=1543819&forum_id=22102 Post: Startup takes up to 8 mins] -- in Help discussion forum


[[Category:Development]]
[[Category:Development]]

Latest revision as of 23:41, 23 July 2008

Performance refers to both memory consumption and the speed of the application. We should try to prevent FreeMind from becoming significantly less performant as the versions accomodate new features.

Memory consumption

  • Of Java virtual machine: some 17 MB on Windows 2000. (To be updated and researched.)
  • Of the data objects allocated by FreeMind, above all the node models. (To be detailed and researched.)

Speed

Some people experienced long starts of 0.8.0, for their having a lot of entries in classpath.

In 0.9.0 having many addition icons in ~/freemind/icons slows down the startup

Links